shveddy 0 #1 May 3, 2015 http://youtu.be/BRxyZpEmdVw Seems reasonable to me that he can pull it off. If the military can drop heavy things with little fins for steering and hit a car's sun roof, then a skydiver should be able to use a similar guidance system to hit a 100x100 target. But my god, that's commitment. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
councilman24 37 #2 May 3, 2015 And I hope someone swoops this one just like landing a wingsuit and the high altitude record. Little fanfare, no BS, no buildup. Shut up and jump and tell us later. I'm old for my age. Terry Urban D-8631 FAA DPRE Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,589 #3 May 3, 2015 The lengths some people will go to, just to avoid packing. "There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shveddy 0 #4 May 3, 2015 HANO (high altitude, no opening) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlyingRhenquest 1 #5 May 4, 2015 ryoder The lengths some people will go to, just to avoid packing. Yeah, I'd totally try a plane to plane transfer in a wingsuit just to avoid the pack job. Heh heh heh. I assume he's not doing this in US airspace. FAA regs and all...I'm trying to teach myself how to set things on fire with my mind. Hey... is it hot in here? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JeffCa 0 #6 May 4, 2015 Can I suggest that the name of this thread be changed, so that people know what it's about or can at least find it later with the search function? We seem pretty bad at this on this forum. "So many fatalities and injuries are caused by decisions jumpers make before even getting into the aircraft. Skydiving can be safe AND fun at the same time...Honest." - Bill Booth Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RiggerLee 61 #7 May 4, 2015 So I'm trying to think about what's involved in this. I'm not sure how well it will work. I think it's a question of the inertia of the net/frame/cables of the device. You hit it at 120 mph but all of that has to accelerate to 120 to slow you down softly. Their is some cushion with the net folding inwards and the force is spread out but just to get all that moving I'm thinking cheese grader. LeeLee [email protected] www.velocitysportswear.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shveddy 0 #8 May 4, 2015 JeffCaCan I suggest that the name of this thread be changed, so that people know what it's about or can at least find it later with the search function? We seem pretty bad at this on this forum. Yea, I agree - it's just all I could think of at the time. I can't change it though - I suppose a mod can do something? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydiverek 61 #9 May 4, 2015 RiggerLeeSo I'm trying to think about what's involved in this. I'm not sure how well it will work. I think it's a question of the inertia of the net/frame/cables of the device. You hit it at 120 mph but all of that has to accelerate to 120 to slow you down softly. Their is some cushion with the net folding inwards and the force is spread out but just to get all that moving I'm thinking cheese grader. Lee Pause the video at the 'drawing' portion, it talks about pistons and compresing columns, I believe. So, the whole structure would give, too. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydiverek 61 #10 May 4, 2015 skydiverek***So I'm trying to think about what's involved in this. I'm not sure how well it will work. I think it's a question of the inertia of the net/frame/cables of the device. You hit it at 120 mph but all of that has to accelerate to 120 to slow you down softly. Their is some cushion with the net folding inwards and the force is spread out but just to get all that moving I'm thinking cheese grader. Lee Pause the video at the drawing portion, it talks about pistons and compresing columns, I believe. So, the whole structure would give, too. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LukeAikins 0 #11 May 6, 2015 If you can make stuff you always wanted to do happen without money then good on ya. Most people need sponsors to do stuff the right way plus to make a living. Gary with his wingsuit and boxes and Allen with his Google I have mad respect for. But my favorite is people talking trash that don't know me. I am just giving you shit to each his own. Luke Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
councilman24 37 #12 May 6, 2015 Your right, I don't know you and my comment was much more at Red Bull's PR program than at you. Its effective but I still don't like it. I'd say the same thing about any extreme sport stunt that Red Bull sponsors. They leave a bad taste in my mouth. Pun intended.I'm old for my age. Terry Urban D-8631 FAA DPRE Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kuai43 7 #13 May 6, 2015 25,000'? Not impressive enough from 10K, or even 5K??Every fight is a food fight if you're a cannibal Goodness is something to be chosen. When a man cannot choose, he ceases to be a man. - Anthony Burgess Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #14 May 6, 2015 RiggerLeeSo I'm trying to think about what's involved in this. I'm not sure how well it will work. I think it's a question of the inertia of the net/frame/cables of the device. You hit it at 120 mph but all of that has to accelerate to 120 to slow you down softly. Their is some cushion with the net folding inwards and the force is spread out but just to get all that moving I'm thinking cheese grader. Lee I'm thinking just a good old fashion PLF. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dqpacker 7 #15 May 6, 2015 This is just a bigger version of a carnival ride that drops you into a net. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mentosfresh 0 #16 May 6, 2015 SCAD Jumping? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjEsWj369rc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JeffCa 0 #17 May 6, 2015 I'm trying to determine how difficult this stunt is. We know it's brave (or stupid), but how hard is it? Assuming the spot is good, could any competent skydiver guide into a spot 100'x100' on the ground, or does it require much more skill than that? How would we test/practice if we could do it, without killing ourselves? "So many fatalities and injuries are caused by decisions jumpers make before even getting into the aircraft. Skydiving can be safe AND fun at the same time...Honest." - Bill Booth Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grue 1 #18 May 6, 2015 JeffCaI'm trying to determine how difficult this stunt is. We know it's brave (or stupid), but how hard is it? Assuming the spot is good, could any competent skydiver guide into a spot 100'x100' on the ground, or does it require much more skill than that? How would we test/practice if we could do it, without killing ourselves? It'd be about the same as flying through a 90-way round formation on their belly when you're in a head-down dive, in theory. (the math behind this claim is based on a 10,000sqft surface area, which has a circumference of approximately 354 feet. If we're very generous and say the average skydiver has a 4 foot armspan in a stable belly to earth position, that puts us at around 90 people. Then if you figure around a 120mph fall rate vs the 200-ish that any experienced jumper can presumably hit, you get a delta of 80mph. Still 50% lower than Aikins will be doing if he doesn't have any sort of high-drag suit on, but it's at least a sort of thing a jumper can IMAGINE.cavete terrae. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xsniper 1 #19 May 6, 2015 grue***I'm trying to determine how difficult this stunt is. We know it's brave (or stupid), but how hard is it? Assuming the spot is good, could any competent skydiver guide into a spot 100'x100' on the ground, or does it require much more skill than that? How would we test/practice if we could do it, without killing ourselves? It'd be about the same as flying through a 90-way round formation on their belly when you're in a head-down dive, in theory. (the math behind this claim is based on a 10,000sqft surface area, which has a circumference of approximately 354 feet. If we're very generous and say the average skydiver has a 4 foot armspan in a stable belly to earth position, that puts us at around 90 people. Then if you figure around a 120mph fall rate vs the 200-ish that any experienced jumper can presumably hit, you get a delta of 80mph. Still 50% lower than Aikins will be doing if he doesn't have any sort of high-drag suit on, but it's at least a sort of thing a jumper can IMAGINE. Well, that gives me some perspective . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FataMorgana 0 #20 May 6, 2015 Quote How would we test/practice if we could do it, without killing ourselves? Training may be easier than it appears to be (aside from the massive ball that will be needed to execute this stunt). Remember Jeb Corliss training for the Flying Dagger stunt. He actually used a visualization software allowing him to fly through the virtual replica of the crack.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRBXF_Unwm0The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge. Stephen Hawking Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stayhigh 2 #21 May 7, 2015 I remember this... http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ac4_1330294369 Best outcome is that he walks away like that dude from England who landed in a box, the other outcome is the above.Bernie Sanders for President 2016 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pchapman 278 #22 May 7, 2015 Dwaine Weston meets the Royal Gorge Bridge, for those not clicking through Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shveddy 0 #23 May 7, 2015 Not to detract from Mr. Aikins' skydiving skills, but the difficulty stunt is almost entirely technical. Most of us could hit a target that big, but only if the spot were right. (Whether any of us are that confident in our skydiving skills and ability to coordinate the technical details of a perfect spot is a whole other issue) So I imagine that a lot of careful preparation, practice and engineering is going to go into being 110% sure that he gets a perfect spot and that he has the ability to make accurate adjustments in real time to compensate for the inevitable discrepancies between calculations and the reality of falling through 25000 feet of air. Ditto for lots of engineering going into the net contraption. Luke, since you've joined this thread can you explain why you guys decided to add the variables that come with a HALO jump into the mix? Why not just 13000 feet? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shveddy 0 #24 May 7, 2015 Go make a jump when there are little puffy clouds at around 4000 feet, choose a particular point along the edge of one and try to hit it. You'll probably get pretty close, and even hit it reliably with practice. He's technically more maneuverable than a wingsuit, and wingsuits have been giving high fives, smashing small styrofoam flags and zooming into caves for a while now. He can travel equally far in any direction he pleases. It's just as easy for him to go north as south or east or west. Wingsuits on the other hand can go down, left and right but they have much less maneuverability when they're trying to go up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beatnik 2 #25 May 9, 2015 Might be the first time it is intentionally planned but not the first time this has been done. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Alkemade Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites